Monday, December 30, 2019

2019 "Top 10" (Categories) - #6

6. Didn’t Knock My Socks Off, but It Was Still Pretty Good

This is probably the biggest category. There's nothing really wrong with these, and I liked them okay, but they didn't have much of an impact on me (at least, not as much as other films this year).

Blinded by the Light

This is from the director of Bend It Like Beckham and Bride & Prejudice, and it shows (in a good way!). It especially resembles Beckham in its depiction of a young person carrying a secret passion for something they have to hide from their family because of cultural and gender expectations. The use of Springsteen’s music is great in this, mostly heard through our hero’s headphones, but there’s a traditional musical number to “Born to Run” that works without turning the movie into a full-blown musical (nothing wrong with those, of course, I’m just not sure it’s the right fit for Springsteen). I don’t love this as much as others seem to, but it’s still quite enjoyable. (Available to rent on most streaming services.)


Deathcember

A holiday horror anthology movie, this is 24 (well, technically 26) stories that have no connective tissue whatsoever. As such, it’s hit and miss. There are only a few of the shorts that I genuinely loved and a couple that flat-out offended me (no thank you forever to “Crappy Holiday”). Still, there’s a good bit to enjoy. I did like the device of the advent calendar doors that led to each tale, and that tied neatly into the first story of a boy obsessed with advent calendar chocolate. There were also some unexpected recognizable names among the filmmakers -- Ruggero Deodato (director of Cannibal Holocaust) directed one of the shorts, as did Lucky McKee (director of May). And another of the shorts features legend Barbara Crampton, which made my horror-loving heart very happy. (Not yet released. This seems like something Shudder might pick up.)


First Love

Solid, middle-of-the-road Miike flick. I mean, the guy has made over a hundred movies in just under three decades and they can’t all stand out, but I did like this. I do think the title is doing an awful lot of the movie’s work for it in defining the relationship between the two central characters. But it’s a compelling premise (it reminded me a bit of Smokin’ Aces), even if at times it’s difficult to discern what’s going on. By the end, though, you’re genuinely invested in these characters and their survival. (Available on home video in February.)


Frozen II

I like the story of this movie maybe even more than the first one, but I wish they hadn’t tried so hard to make this fit the Disney formula (yes, I know that’s asking the impossible of literally the biggest brand in movies right now). There’s just such a pull to have the requisite number of lighthearted, funny moments that feel slightly out of place in what another studio could have turned into a dark, emotional masterpiece. The songs are great, though there’s not a juggernaut like “Let It Go” in here (but holy mackerel, are they trying to make “Into the Unknown” that song  it is not, and I’m sorry, but it’s the least interesting song in the movie to me). I like Olaf’s song, which has a surprisingly melancholy streak, but the best ones for me are the ethereal “Show Yourself” and ESPECIALLY “The Next Right Thing,” which is such a beautiful portrait of climbing your way out of depression and grief step by step. (In theaters.)


Glass

I liked this more as a follow-up to Split than as part of the Unbreakable-verse, but I did love seeing Samuel L. Jackson and Bruce Willis back as these characters, and even Spencer Treat Clark as Bruce Willis’s son. The reveal is … okay, but I kind of like that the “twist” is not such a huge thing like it is in Sixth Sense and Unbreakable. You can only spend that nickel so many times. (Available on HBO; for sale but not to rent on most streaming sites.)


Harriet

I think this is a classic case of a subject that everyone was too precious about to make into a great film. It was the first film ever about Harriet Tubman, which is crazy, and it seems like everyone involved was too afraid to alter details to make it into a movie that works beyond a simple history lesson. And even the details they *did* change outraged people, so they might as well have gone a bit further to actually say something that’s not in a hundred history textbooks. Director Kasi Lemmons is a phenomenal filmmaker  when she’s not constrained. If you haven’t seen her film Eve’s Bayou, you should get on that immediately. I wish she had felt more empowered to put her unique stamp on it and make it a little weirder. I don’t dislike what she made here, but I think it could have been more powerful if it had been a little less reverent. (Still in some theaters.)


Honey Boy

This movie had one of the most pretentious trailers I’d ever seen and, not being a huge fan of Shia LaBeouf, I wasn’t terribly excited about this and mainly went to see it because so many critics raved about it. But it won me over. Shia is really good in it, playing his own father (I think the marketing and press blitz maybe oversold how “brave” a performance it was, but I’m sure it was emotionally tough, perhaps even cathartic, and can’t have been an easy task). Noah Jupe (also in this year’s Ford v. Ferrari) is the star here, though, playing a version of Shia, and he’s definitely the heart of the movie. Having said that, when you have a good child performance, it’s almost always at least partly because they have a good adult to work off of. (Still in some theaters.)


The Hustle

Not to be confused with Hustlers (the one with JLo). This is the Anne Hathaway and Rebel Wilson-starring con-woman movie. I liked it for the most part, but I’m getting tired of Rebel Wilson’s size being used as a punchline (even though a good deal of that is likely her own idea). The friendship and competition between the two leads is great, though, especially the contrast in their respective styles. I was just typing that it reminded me a lot of Dirty Rotten Scoundrels when I did a quick Google and yep, it’s definitely a remake, with Hathaway as Michael Caine and Wilson as Steve Martin. (Available to rent on most streaming services.)


It Chapter Two

Not as strong as the first, but I still feel a strong connection to it, not least because these characters are exactly my age. I did love the additional characterization to Richie as closeted and likely pining for his friend (which I understand was not in the novel) and *especially* that some genius in the costume department gave him that shirt with the cross pattern, which is an almost replica of the shirt worn by Jessie in A Nightmare on Elm Street 2. Also, having never read the novel and not knowing what to expect, I was ridiculously happy with the shipping in this. BENVERLY 4 EVER! (Available on most streaming services.)


Joker

Ehh, I guess? It’s okay? I liked it fine. There’s some admirable filmmaking on display (though it owes a lot to 1970s and 80s Scorsese  Ira Madison said Todd Phillips is “All About Eve”-ing Scorsese, and that doesn’t seem far off the mark). But I find the idea that it’s “dangerous” or “revolutionary” laughable. It’s not news that the world is being destroyed by rejected entitled white dudes. We got that memo. I also think the movie is weakest when it’s tying itself to the Batman canon, which it occasionally does. Joaquin Phoenix is very good, but the *best* Joker ever? I’m not sure (I’m also not sure I even like that being some competition). I loved that Robert DeNiro plays the Johnny Carson-esque character, almost as if his character Rupert Pupkin from The King of Comedy finally made it. But it only reminded me how much better an expression of this idea The King of Comedy is. This whole movie feels like that “for those who didn’t catch the reference” meme. No, yeah, we got it. Thanks. I did like this movie. But incendiary it is not. (Still in some theaters and available to buy on streaming services.)


Judy

This is an okay movie with a GREAT performance at its center. I do appreciate that it’s not just a “greatest hits” of Judy’s life and that it centers on one specific period (with some flashbacks). Renee Zellweger, deservedly at the forefront of the Best Actress conversation, sounds nothing like Judy Garland, but she embodies her so thoroughly that it’s unnerving. There are moments when you look at her and she just IS Judy. You can tell Zellweger feels a kinship with Garland, beyond just being a huge fan. And this is a part of Garland’s story that I suspect a lot of people would never have imagined could happen to someone like her (I know I didn’t)  to be broke and have to literally sing for her supper. I kind of wish the movie was as grand as this performance, but then again, that might have been too much. (Still in some theaters and available on streaming services.)


Pet Semetary

I kind of can’t stand the original, so I was low-key excited for another version of this story where I didn’t want to strangle basically everyone in the film. I did end up liking this better (John Lithgow was especially well used, I thought), and I liked the switch of having the little girl be the one brought back to life (#feminism). The cat is pretty iconic and I love that those pics of it on the red carpet went viral. My main take-away, though, was that I really want to read the novel now, as I understand that neither film is an adequate adaptation and that it’s not really possible to adapt it effectively at all. (Available to buy on streaming services.)


Ready or Not

This was great fun, and I really enjoyed it, but I’m not sure it’s the game-changer people thought it was going to be. I like the premise, I like the iconic image of a woman in a bridal gown toting a shotgun, and the ending is pretty satisfying, but it doesn’t entirely add up to me. Mainly, the groom’s motivations and actions are totally inconsistent, to the point of being a plot hole. And I feel like I saw this story told a bit better in You’re Next. Samara Weaving makes a great final girl, though. And I’m loving this year’s theme of “screw rich entitled (usually) white people.” I’m sure this would make a great party movie, perhaps in conjunction with a game night. Maybe even a double feature with last year’s Game Night! (Available on most streaming services.)


Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark

This is a solid anthology(ish?) horror, though I guess it’s not technically an anthology. I felt like the stories themselves were a bit short and simplistic (though the sequence with the Pale Lady is a standout), but the wrap-around story is the main story anyway. Good kid performances, a good bully comeuppance, and some memorable monsters (not to mention some body horror). (Available on most streaming services.)


Toy Story 4

This shouldn’t have worked, but it does and I really liked the message. Some really great adventure sequences, which we’ve come to expect from this franchise -- everything with Gabby Gabby and those hella creepy antique toys is EXCELLENT. There are incredible new characters -- Forky, Duke Kaboom, Ducky and Bunny, Gabby Gabby (hello, character arc!), and OMG the impossibly adorable Giggle McDimples are stars, every one. And I love the examination of what it means to know what your place is and what happens when that place doesn’t really exist for you anymore. Still, please let’s be done with this franchise. It’s perfect as it is. This was great, but don’t topple the tree by putting too much stuff on it. (Available on streaming services; not yet on Disney+.)


VFW

My only real problem with this was that it was so dang dark. Like, Battle of Winterfell dark, with lots of purples and blues  my old-ass eyeballs couldn’t see a thing. Other than that, I liked it a lot. It feels a lot like a Larry Cohen / Fred Williamson joint, and not just because Fred Williamson is in it. It reminded me a lot of Cohen’s last film as a director, Original Gangstas, where a bunch of “old guys” are the action heroes against a malevolent group of young street thugs. It also reminded me of Assault on Precinct 13, in that it’s a zombie movie without actual zombies. The “zombies” in this case are kids hopped up on some superdrug (possibly a commentary on the opioid crisis?) that makes them essentially braindead mutants. Good action and it’s great seeing all these older-generation actors (Williamson, William Sadler, Stephen Lang, Martin “sweep the leg” Kove, David Patrick “Warriors come out to play-y-ay” Kelly, and even George “Norm!” Wendt) kicking ass and taking names. Just wish it weren’t so hard to look at. (Opens February 14.)


VHYes

This was a fun one from Jack Henry Robbins (son of Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon). I think this actually qualifies as a found footage film, as the premise is that we’re watching home movies and weird late-night television shows that have been recorded over the main character’s parents’ wedding tape. So we get all these weird snippets intercut with short clips of the wedding, where you can already see cracks starting to form in the parents’ marriage. I wish this was less self-aware than it is, but it’s still great fun. I also wish some of those shows were real (especially "Painting With Joan" and its spin-offs). (Opens January 12.)


Why Don’t You Just Die!

This was an enjoyable bit of Russian ultraviolence if you’re into that kind of thing. Our protagonist, Matvei, goes to an apartment armed with a hammer, his intent being to kill his girlfriend’s father. Cue a flurry of failed murder attempts, flashbacks, reversals, and more mayhem than seems possible for such a closed setting. Add in some excellent song choices and you have a really good revenge stew with elements of Tarantino, Sion Sono and Sergio Leone. Good stuff, and a surprisingly apt title, but VERY violent. Be warned. Biggest downside -- it has an especially terrible use of my least favorite trope (rot13 for spoilers - ylvat nobhg orvat encrq). (Not yet released, except in a few European countries; no date set yet.)

2019 "Top 10" (Categories) - #7

7. Loved These More Than I Probably Should

If I were the kind of person who used the phrase “guilty pleasure,” that might apply here. 


Aquaman

This was pretty ridiculous, but I had such a good time with it and I wish more superhero movies would embrace the absurdity of their premises. It’s a fantastic-looking film, and I don’t just mean Jason Momoa and Amber Heard. The set design and character design are really beautiful. I like that Arthur is a reluctant hero. I wish that Mera wasn’t the typical super-capable woman who ends up being second banana and love interest to the Actual Hero, but she’s still amazing to watch. And OMG JULIE ANDREWS IS IN THIS. Or her voice, anyway. (Only available for rental through disc services; streaming options all require you to buy.)



Charlie’s Angels

It’s a real shame this hasn’t done better ticket wise, and I think this is clearly an example of a studio just not being behind it and not even really knowing how to market it without big name stars and a Destiny’s Child hit song tie-in. I *LOVE* the idea of a worldwide network of “Angels” instead of just the three, and Kristen Stewart, Naomi Scott and Ella Balinska (and Elizabeth Banks) make a great team. I also love how they tie all the previous incarnations together with this movie into one big Charlie’s Angels canon. The plot doesn’t make a lick of sense, but as I recall the same usually could be said for the TV show. (No longer in theaters; not yet available on home video.)



The Good Liar

This is, objectively, not great. Not even good. For one thing, it takes place in 2009, not 2019, because the main characters are supposed to have been teenagers during WW2 and they’d be too old in 2019 for the events of this movie. Which just feels like they waited too late to make the movie. The story is ridiculous and I saw the reveal coming from a mile away. It’s always fun to see two titans of acting play off each other, though, and Mirren and McKellan make this watchable, even as silly as it is. (Still playing in a few theaters.)



Greta

Good lord, this is bazonkers but it’s so much fun! Isabelle Huppert seems to be the only one who knows exactly what kind of movie she is in and she sells every bit of this so hard it’s amazing to watch. Chloe Grace Moretz is … okay, but she’s still never been as interesting as she was a decade ago as Hit Girl (okay, she was pretty good in Clouds of Sils Maria). And she shouldn’t be less interesting than her sidekick BFF, who is the real hero of this movie. If anything is “wrong” with this, it’s that it takes a bit too long to get to the truly crazypants place. (Available on HBO.)



Richard Jewell

There are serious problems with this movie, from the depiction of Kathy Scruggs to the one-sided and decidedly negative view of both law enforcement and the media at a time in our history when that feels very dangerous. However, the incredible performances of Kathy Bates and Sam Rockwell, and especially the breakout performance of Paul Walter Hauser as Jewell himself, won me over. I know people exactly like them and they felt achingly real to me. Still, it would have been so much better to have had at least one character in either/both the FBI or the newspaper who displayed the tiniest bit of objection to what those characters were doing. (In theaters.)



Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker

Honestly, all of these post-Lucas era Star Wars films are (to me) fanfiction, of various flavors. That's not exactly a criticism, but it's not a compliment either, as these movies do what a lot of fanfic does (and you see it a lot in meta commentary as well, where people “why couldn’t” or “what if” a story to death), which is that much of it exists almost solely to give people what they think they want and make sure everyone is happy instead of creating something new or saying something. Which for fanfiction is fine; that's largely what it's for. But it shouldn't be the primary purpose of a storyteller. I love a lot of things about this movie, but it’s working so hard not to disappoint people that it can’t help being a little disappointing, despite some genuinely great moments. I can’t deny that it’s great to look at, though, with loads of great practical effects and puppetry. There are incredible performances, obviously from Daisy Ridley and Adam Driver whose characters are the heart of the story, but also the people playing more minor roles as well. I think a special shout-out has to go to Anthony Daniels as C-3PO, who is the only cast member who has been in all nine of these movies (plus Rogue One and Solo, though in Solo he played a different character), not to mention all the cameos and guest spots in adjacent media. He’s a true legend and he gets his greatest chance to shine in this movie. (In theaters.)

2019 "Top 10" (Categories) - #8

8. Not as Bad as You May Have Heard 

Both of those had people bracing themselves for terribleness, and a lot of those same people fell prey to their own confirmation bias. But I dug both of these movies, despite the negative hype. 


Aladdin

The 1992 Aladdin is one of my favorite Disney movies  definitely my favorite of the “new Disney renaissance” that began with The Little Mermaid — and I really loved this as a companion piece to it. I thought all the musical numbers were great, I thought Genie looked much better in the context of the movie than he did in the trailers and still images, and it was nice to have the characters played by ethnically appropriate actors. I did miss Iago and some of the more comedic elements of the animated version, but this wasn’t nearly the horror show everyone thought it was going to be. (Available on Disney+.


Dumbo

Tim Burton has had a mixed output since his (arguable) heyday in the late 80s / early 90s. But I really liked this. I like the recent, more family-friendly era of Colin Farrell’s career and he’s very good in this. I’m always bracing myself for saccharine, cloying child performances, but the kids in this movie are lovely. Dumbo himself looks a bit cartoonish but I still found myself charmed by him. Eva Green, as always, is the MVP as the supposedly villainous character who actually has a heart. And I’m very much here for the Batman Returns reunion of Burton, Keaton and DeVito. (Available on Disney+.)

2019 "Top 10" (Categories) - #9

9. Just Not My Jam (But Others Seem to Like Them and That’s OK)

Despite my ability to avoid movies I hate, there are always a few that come so highly recommended and that seemingly everyone else falls for that I go and see in complete expectation of being awed only to be left scratching my head. But it’s no biggie, because everyone has different tastes!

Brightburn

“What if Superman was evil?” was a rad idea, and I’m almost always on board for evil/creepy kids, but I did not care for this movie. I particularly didn’t like the way it creates all this ambiguity about the main character’s consciousness of what he’s doing. Elizabeth Banks is the classic mom who thinks her child can do no wrong, but she’s in denial for far too long for someone who knows what she must know from the beginning. This might not have been on a lot of critics’ lists, but a lot of genre fans seemed to like it and I just … ehhh. (Only available for rental through disc services; streaming options all require you to buy.)


Hagazussa: A Heathen’s Curse

I love me some folk horror (see one of my number ones), but I didn’t like this that much. If you saw The Witch, this movie is its much less uplifting, glacially paced German cousin. Yes, even more glacially paced than The Witch, which compared to this is a Fast and Furious movie. It’s beautiful to look at and it has a great, simple, terrifying score, but it is SUCH a downer and, honestly, is kind of pretentious. It has some smart things to say about how society treats women who make it on their own, without men, and how these women get their own back, so to speak. But it just wasn’t enjoyable to me at all. Not that every movie has to be enjoyable, but this was beyond my tolerance for despair. (Streaming on Shudder and available for rent from most streaming sources.)


The Mustang

Not to be confused with the Turkish-French film Mustang from 2015. There seems to be a new rash of movies reexamining traditional masculinity, and I’m all for that. But this movie, about a violent convict who takes part in a therapy program that involves training wild mustangs, can’t decide what it wants to be. Is it a gritty, realistic emotional drama or a fantasy where things happen just because it’s a movie and people expect certain things to happen? (Ask someone who knows about horses how realistic this movie is.) Great performances, but this fell flat for me. And the metaphor is so on-the-nose I had a hard time taking it seriously. (Only available for rental through disc services; streaming options all require you to buy.)

The Souvenir

Look, I know. I KNOW. It’s on every Top 10 list I’ve seen this year. But it took me until almost halfway through this movie about a toxic, codependent relationship to even realize that the two main characters were even *in* a relationship. I can get behind subtlety, but there’s subtlety, there’s subliminal, then there’s this movie. Movies like this make me feel dumb, which then makes me angry. I did like the scene featuring an unrecognizable Richard Ayoade, which was kind of the first point in the movie where I actually understood what was going on. I feel like I should give this another look, though, especially as there’s a sequel coming out next year. (Available on Amazon Prime.)

2019 "Top 10" (Categories) - #10

10. The Hyperbole-Breaker

This one is a category unto itself. I’ve gotten pretty good at avoiding movies I end up actively hating, at least in a theatrical release. But while I don’t *hate* this movie, it’s undeniably terrible.


Cats

Technical problems and narrative problems  this movie has it all. It’s ill-conceived from the off, for many many reasons  chief among them the portrayal of the cats themselves. And not just the creepy digital stuff, I mean the way the actors play the cats  too much writhing and prancing and wide-eyed wonder, and not nearly enough sitting and glaring (James Corden and Rebel Wilson are, weirdly, the most catlike in this respect when they’re sitting on that barge). Spielberg was developing an animated version in the 1990s, which seems like a much better idea, especially when you see the concept art (*insert Adele “we could have had it aaaaaaall” gif*). But at some point I just gave in to it, and the second half I actually found sort of engaging. Almost everything from the initial "Memory" number on had *something* for me to hang on to (though more directors of musicals need to learn the lesson that “park and bark” numbers DO NOT WORK on film the way they do on stage). Having said that, it’s still a stunning example of someone committing to something they have no idea how to bring about and aren’t willing to do the work to make it not be terrible. (In theaters.)

Monday, July 29, 2019

Once Upon a Time ... in Hollywood

One thing that struck me about ONCE UPON A TIME … IN HOLLYWOOD more than anything else, I think, was that late 1960s LA seems like it was an amazing time and place to be a moviegoer. All these solid, entertaining films that I’d never heard of before Quentin Tarantino started doing interviews and podcasts and Q&As for this film, and programming a lot of them to screen at the New Beverly Cinema (and that are extremely hard to find now). And not a “tentpole” franchise film in sight. Nothing inherently wrong with franchise films, but man, there is a serious buffet of movie titles on display over the course of this film.


KILL BILL is always going to have a special place in my heart among his movies, but OUATIH might be my favorite experience seeing a Tarantino film. I realize that he’s very much not some people’s cup of tea (both as a filmmaker and as a personality), and if that is the case for someone, this probably won’t turn them around. However, never having been in that camp, his movies have long been Major Events for me. I’ve never cared about him being self-indulgent (a frequent charge against him) because his films always seem to indulge ME, which is why I go to the movies in the first place, so I can't imagine complaining about that.

Having said that, this movie was quite a surprise and may not be what a lot of people expect from a QT film. There’s very little violence in the film until the last ten minutes or so. There’s not even *quite* as much profanity, it doesn’t seem like (though certainly still a good bit). And while the characters do talk a lot about movies and namedrop actors and obscure movies and television shows (a staple of QT’s dialogue), the movie is *set* in Hollywood, with characters who are in the movie business, so it’s a lot more organic and doesn’t just feel like people trying to sound cool (which I have nothing against, but hoo boy some people sure do).

There’s not a ton of plot to speak of. Around 90 percent of the movie takes place over just two and a half days, and a significant amount of real estate is spent on people just going about their day -- an actor killing time on set between scenes, that actor’s stuntman/driver/gofer/BFF driving around LA, and an actress running errands or dancing around the house. The film is very character-driven and -- like MIDSOMMAR -- dropped me into a setting that I was more than happy to get lost in.

So let me walk you through it. Here come All The Spoilers, including the ending of the film. 

(Apologies that what follows is not so much a review as a plot summary on crack, but this is the only way I could write about it. And doing it this way is like getting to experience the movie again, and I hope that reading it could be that way for you as well.)


Once upon a time … in Hollywood … there was an actor named Rick Dalton (Leonardo DiCaprio). He was a pretty big television star in the late 1950s and his particular claim to fame was a western show called “Bounty Law,” in which he played the hero, Jake Cahill. He left that show to try and break into movies and might have had a career similar to Steve McQueen’s, but while he did a few decent movies (including the sadly fictional “Tanner” and “The 14 Fists of McCluskey” -- the latter resembling a B-movie version of INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS), Rick never had a breakout hit like THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN, so movies didn’t really pan out for him. Unfortunately, he burned a lot of bridges leaving his popular show (to say nothing of the show’s fans), so when he tried to go back to television his name wasn’t what it had been. He’s now stuck playing the heavy in other actors’ star-vehicle shows. A sort of Dino DeLaurentiis-like producer, Marvin Schwarzs (Al Pacino), is trying to convince him to go to Italy and make some films there. A lot of second-tier stars end up doing this because Italian filmmakers may want the Big Name Stars, but they’ll settle for a reasonable facsimile -- if they can’t get Marlon Brando they’ll take Burt Reynolds; if they can’t get Steve McQueen they’ll take Rick Dalton. Rick is dubious, but he takes to heart Schwarzs’s point that repeatedly being bested by the heroes on television (a network trick, he calls it, to build a new star's reputation) diminishes what Rick's name is worth to audiences. He comes out of the meeting devastated and in tears (manly tears, which Cliff helps him hide by lending him his sunglasses). Incidentally, it does not surprise me AT ALL that there are suddenly a LOT of Rick/Cliff shippers. 


Rick claimed earlier to Marvin that his car was in the shop and Cliff was just giving him a ride, but in reality, as relayed to us by narrator Kurt Russell, his license was revoked for excessive drunk driving tickets and Cliff has to drive him around everywhere. So after dinner at Musso & Frank, Cliff drives him to his house in Benedict Canyon. On Cielo Drive. As they pull into the drive, he and Cliff spot his new neighbors -- Roman Polanski and Sharon Tate -- also pulling in next door. Rick presumably bought his house at the height of his success, when he could afford it, and there’s a point here about the nature of Hollywood and how failure and success can live right next to each other. Rick muses that he could be one pool party away from being in a Polanski movie (this is February 1969, less than a year after Polanski’s ROSEMARY’S BABY made him the hottest director in Hollywood), and he feels much better than he did earlier in the evening. After Cliff leaves, Rick spends some time going over his lines for a TV pilot he is shooting the next day against a rehearsal tape and I seriously coveted that little reel-to-reel cassette player he uses, even though I don’t own any reel-to-reel cassettes. It must be one of the greatest jobs ever to do set dressing for movies and get to rummage around stores that specialize in providing film and TV productions with all that knick-knackery.

The next morning, Cliff drops Rick off on the studio lot and we see what Rick’s day on set is like. He meets with wardrobe and makeup and is a little dismayed that they want to do away with his carefully maintained pompadour and give him a long-hair wig and handlebar mustache, essentially making him look like a hippie (he ends up looking a bit like Dennis Hopper in EASY RIDER, but that movie wouldn’t come out for another five months). He asks how the audience will know it’s Rick Dalton under all that fuzz, but the director tells him (in the most respectful, coddling way imaginable) that he wants the audience to see the character, not the celebrity -- or more specifically, not Jake Cahill from “Bounty Law.” Rick has a conversation with the star of the show, James Stacy (played by Timothy Olyphant), and tells him about a part he got because first-choice star Fabian injured himself -- illustrating to us just how much success in Hollywood relies on luck -- and how he was on a shortlist of alternates for McQueen’s role in THE GREAT ESCAPE (*cue fantasy sequence where Rick imagines himself in that role and Leo is digitally inserted into the actual movie*). He has another conversation (one of my favorite sequences) with a young actress who is exceedingly precocious for her eight years of age. They talk about craft and why she only responds to her character’s name when she’s on set, and she asks him to tell her about the novel he’s reading -- a potboiler western about a cowboy called “Easy Breezy.” Easy Breezy’s story, about a man who is getting older and isn't what he once was, hits a little too close to home for Rick and he gets emotional, and the young actress is deeply moved. I could have watched these two interact for an entire movie.


When it comes time for Rick to shoot his first scene, he has some trouble remembering his lines and later has a major meltdown in his trailer (a meltdown I found all too relatable). He comes back to shoot another scene, this one with Wayne Maunder (played by the late Luke Perry), along with the young girl from the earlier scene. This second scene goes much better, with Rick really showing off what made him a star in the first place. After they finish shooting, the young girl tells him (in a moment you’ve probably seen in the trailers) that that was the best acting she’s ever seen, leading Rick to well up with pride. All in all, a good day for Rick.

*****


Once upon a time … in Hollywood … there was a stuntman named Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt). He’s been around the block, as they say, and has spent the past several years being Rick Dalton’s stunt double pretty much exclusively. As Rick’s luck has waned, so has Cliff’s, and he makes a little extra money being Rick’s driver and gofer. He’s also Rick’s closest friend and looks out for him and bucks him up when he needs it. After he drops Rick and Rick’s car off on Cielo Drive on Saturday night (after the Musso & Frank meeting), he gets in his own beat-up car and drives home to his trailer, which sits in an empty lot behind a drive-in theater in Van Nuys. We spend a few minutes with him as he feeds his pit bull Brandy (who is SUCH a good doggie, yes she is!) and makes himself some boxed macaroni and cheese, which he eats straight from the pot (without even any milk and butter, poor guy), and watches some television.

Cliff drives Rick to the set of the pilot the next day and we learn that Cliff doesn’t have a great reputation on movie sets, at least with certain people. For one thing, there are persistent rumors that he killed his wife and got away with it, which gives others a healthy fear of him but the ambiguity of whether this is true (not to mention the implication that he killed her because she was a shrill, nagging bitch) is the biggest wrinkle in the movie for me. He understands when Rick tells him he can’t ask the production to hire him and a bit later we’ll get a flashback to explain why (in addition to the wife-murder rumor, he once threw Bruce Lee into a stunt coordinator’s wife’s car during a “playful” fight on the set of "The Green Hornet" -- causing more damage to the car than to Bruce Lee -- and got kicked off the set). Cliff's "hm, fair enough" reaction to the flashback that he's clearly just experienced with the audience is priceless.

Cliff spends the morning fixing the antenna on Rick’s roof, which gives us a significant stretch of shirtless Brad Pitt (who is still hotter in his mid-50s than any man ought to be), wearing a tool belt that has a compartment for a beer can (more likely it’s for something else and Cliff just *uses* it for a beer can). He hears Paul Revere and the Raiders blasting from the stereo at the Polanski house and watches as someone pulls up to the driveway in a Hostess Twinkie truck. The guy gets out and walks toward the house, and has a brief exchange with the person who answers the door. I'll get into more detail on this in the Sharon Tate section, but this visitor is Charles Manson, who really did visit that house several months before the murders took place.


Cliff spends the afternoon driving around Los Angeles. A substantial part of this movie is Cliff driving around LA and listening to the car radio. I know some people think this is a dull part of the movie, but it’s one of my favorite parts. Almost all of the music in this movie is diegetic (i.e., in the scene, not over the scene) and we don’t just get the songs -- we are listening to LA radio in 1969, complete with DJ intros and commercials (the soundtrack has SO MUCH of this!), taken from actual broadcast recordings from KHJ Boss Radio in 1969. We hear Neil Diamond’s new single, “Brother Love’s Traveling Salvation Show,” which is heavily featured in all the movie’s trailers and would have been released a month before most of the movie takes place. Incidentally, I also love how the music in this movie is not just the Greatest Hits of 1969 that everyone’s heard a million times, but it’s a ton of songs that weren’t megahits but would definitely have been on the radio at the time (or, in many cases, that were hits in LA but maybe not anywhere else). I mean, you do get “Mrs. Robinson,” but you get a lot *more* stuff like “Bring a Little Lovin’” by Los Bravos. It really adds to the immersive quality of the movie and feels like you’re hanging out with these characters.

That afternoon, Cliff, who seems open to just about anything while still keeping up his guard, picks up a hitchhiker who calls herself “Pussycat” (played by FOSSE/VERDON’s Margaret Qualley and loosely based on Kathryn Lutesinger). Cliff has seen Pussycat hitching a couple of times before, while he was with Rick. We’ve seen a bit more of her and most will have guessed that she's one of Manson’s girls. In particular, we’ve seen her and several other girls dumpster-diving for food -- a frequent activity of the real Manson girls, when they weren’t trading sex for money and food. We also hear them singing "I'll Never Say Never to Always," a song written by Manson and eventually recorded by him and his Family. When Pussycat tells Cliff she’s going to Chatsworth (about an hour’s drive from LA proper), he’s surprised that she regularly hitchhikes between there and LA, but he agrees to drive her because he doesn’t have anything else to do. He is even more surprised when she tells him she lives at Spahn Movie Ranch, a place he is familiar with because a lot of westerns used to be shot there, including (in this universe) “Bounty Law.” They talk a bit and she offers to fellate him as he drives but he shuts that down as she’s clearly not yet 18 and is not worth going to prison for. #gentleman


They arrive at Spahn Ranch and the movie sets are pretty run down and overrun with hippies (all Manson Family, though that’s not a distinction that means anything to anyone but them yet). Charlie and most of the others have gone to Santa Barbara, but they’ll be back and Pussycat is anxious to introduce Cliff to Charlie (“Charlie’s really gonna dig you”). After meeting Charlie’s semi-lieutenant Tex Watson and a few others, Cliff is a bit suspicious of the whole situation and asks to see George Spahn, who owns the ranch and who Cliff knows from doing stunt work on those sets several years before. The girls tell him in a creepy, Wicker-Man-esque we’re-totally-hiding-something way that George is napping, but Cliff insists. He goes up to the house where George lives and comes face to face with “Squeaky” (played by a near unrecognizable Dakota Fanning). She tries to dissuade Cliff but is unable to keep him from coming into the house and going right into George’s room (in a sequence that is very reminiscent of THE TEXAS CHAIN SAW MASSACRE). Cliff chats a bit with George (played by Bruce Dern), who is blind and doesn’t really remember who Cliff is, but is touched that someone came to visit him. Cliff assures him that he just wants to be sure these new residents aren’t taking advantage of him. (This is all historically accurate -- again, sans Cliff, obviously. The Manson Family did live at Spahn Ranch in the months before the Tate murders. Lynette Fromme was George’s lover and it was basically her job to screw him and keep him happy so he didn’t ask questions. George nicknamed her “Squeaky” for the sound she made when he touched her. She was not involved in the Tate-LaBianca murders but several years later she would attempt to assassinate President Gerald Ford in Sacramento.)

As Cliff leaves the house, it is clear he has worn out his welcome and the antipathy is mutual, so he heads to Rick’s car to get the hell out of Movie Dodge, only to find one of the tires with a knife stuck into it. A gift from another Manson cult member, Clem. Cliff beats he shit out of Clem (prompting the girls to fetch Tex, who had gone off to lead a horseback riding tour) and forces him to replace the slashed tire with the spare. He drives off before Tex can return and that’s the end of that for now.


After picking Rick up from the set and taking him home to Cielo Drive, he goes into the house and the two of them watch the new episode of THE F.B.I., which Rick did a guest role in (someone recently found a copy of the real episode, in which Rick's role was actually played by Burt Reynolds). They drink beer, order pizza and comment on the episode, and Cliff leaves an LSD-dipped cigarette he bought from another (non-Manson?) hippie in Rick’s silver cigarette box, reminding him not to smoke it by mistake. An unusual day, but Cliff would probably say any day not spent in jail is a good day.

*****

Once upon a time … in Hollywood … there was an actress named Sharon Tate (Margot Robbie). She isn’t that well known yet, but she has been in some television and a few films, most notably VALLEY OF THE DOLLS. She has just moved into the house at 10050 Cielo Drive with her husband, famous (and not yet infamous) director Roman Polanski. At the beginning of the film, she and Roman arrive at the airport from a trip and are surrounded by photographers. They are what the kids today would call a “Hollywood power couple.”


Later that evening, they go out for a night on the town. Their destination: a party at the Playboy Mansion with, among others, Steve McQueen, Michelle Phillips, Cass Elliott, and Sharon’s close friend Jay Sebring (Emile Hirsch), hairdresser to the stars and partial inspiration for Warren Beatty's character in SHAMPOO. This movie's Steve McQueen (Damian Lewis) is basically only here to look uncannily like the real McQueen and to give us exposition on Sharon, Roman and Jay. He tells the woman sitting next to him that Sharon and Jay were engaged previously until she fell in love with Roman while working on one of his films (presumably THE FEARLESS VAMPIRE KILLERS). She is still close to Jay, who McQueen says is biding his time until Roman eventually screws up the marriage, and the three of them are inseparable. (I suspect the inseparable part is artistic license, but it was probably a simpler description than their actual dynamic.) And in another of my favorite moments, the woman McQueen is telling this to remarks that Sharon certainly has a “type” -- short, cute, talented men that look like 12-year-old boys. McQueen responds, “I never stood a chance.” I love this movie.

The next day Sharon sleeps late, leaving her husband to have coffee in the back yard and walk her dog, Dr. Sapirstein (aka “Sappy,” named after Dr. Sapirstein in ROSEMARY’S BABY -- again, taken from real life). Jay comes over later and Sharon packs for a trip and dances around the house to some records, teasing Jay that she’s going to tell Jim Morrison that he loves Paul Revere and the Raiders. While Sharon is packing, we see through the window behind her Charles Manson approaching the house, in maybe the most chilling shot of the movie (even though, as I learned for the first time a few months ago, Manson himself didn’t commit any of the murders). Jay answers the door and Charlie asks him where Terry is, saying he’s a friend of Terry’s and of Dennis Wilson (of The Beach Boys). This is another real-life event, though it happened a month later than it does in the film, and Jay wasn’t there -- Charlie spoke with a photographer who had come to the house to do a photoshoot with Sharon.


(Some Context Not Included In Movie: Terry is Terry Melcher, record producer and son of Doris Day; he hung out with the Manson Family a bit and Manson hoped to parlay their friendship into a recording contract. Terry, who was 10050 Cielo Drive’s previous tenant before Roman and Sharon, eventually drove out to Spahn Ranch and gave Charlie an audition, but a few weeks later called him to say it wasn’t going to work out. This phone call is believed to be the main impetus for Charlie instructing a few of his followers to go to Terry’s old house and kill everyone inside, even though he knew Terry no longer lived there. When Jay says “Terry and Candy don’t live here anymore,” he’s referring to Melcher and 23-year-old actress Candice Bergen, who Terry was dating at the time and who had lived with him in the Cielo Drive house. Dennis Wilson was also a one-time friend of Manson, having been introduced to him by two of his hitchhiking Family members he'd picked up a couple of times (one of whom was Patricia Krenwinkle -- see below). Wilson eventually became scared of Charlie’s violent side and basically ghosted him. The Beach Boys’ song “Never Learn Not to Love” was an altered version of a song written by Manson called “Cease to Exist.”)

That afternoon Sharon runs some errands in her Porsche, including picking up a first edition of Thomas Hardy’s Tess of the D’Urbervilles for Roman from a book shop (Polanski would direct a film adaptation of this novel just over a decade later, which he dedicated to Sharon). Like Cliff and many others in this era, she picks up a hippie hitchhiker (probably not one of Manson’s), dropping her off soon after with a farewell hug like they’re good friends (#notallhippies). She spots a movie theater that is playing a movie she’s in, called THE WRECKING CREW, and goes to the box office. Just before she reaches into her purse for ticket money, she decides to tell the ticket girl who she is (not that money is an issue, but she wants the recognition). After some back and forth and a photo request, she is let inside. She dons some oversized glasses for discretion and plops down to watch the movie.


We see a couple of trailers first, and Sharon puts her bare feet on the seat in front of her. I can usually tolerate QT’s foot thing, but if someone did that in real life I would be LIVID no matter who they were. The movie starts and it is the real movie, not a recreation, with the real Sharon Tate. In easily one of the best moments in the film, Sharon gets to enjoy hearing an audience react to her on-screen -- laughing at her pratfalls, and even cheering her on as she fights Nancy Kwan. And during this fight, we get some glimpses of *our* Sharon training for it with *our* Bruce Lee, a fond memory for her and a reminder of the work she put into the role. (Lee really did train the real Sharon, as well as Polanski, as I understand, and he was the fight choreographer for THE WRECKING CREW.) Even though nothing spectacular happens, it’s a pretty great day for Sharon.

There have been many comments about the portrayal of Sharon Tate in this film, beginning with the journalist at Cannes who asked why she didn’t have more lines. Frankly, I think this was one person’s reaction that became a bigger deal than it needed to be because people love drawing conclusions about things they haven’t yet seen. But lines of dialogue aren’t always the best measure of someone’s importance. Sharon gets a LOT of screen time, but she is less a character here and more a symbol, a grim reminder of what is to come. She is still hugely significant and the movie would not exist without her; she is the reason for its being, as we’ll see in the film’s contentious ending. We see her living her Best Life, juxtaposed with Rick’s melancholy and uncertainty, and just seeing her living her life has meaning in itself because it’s something the real Sharon Tate was cruelly denied.

*****


Once upon a time … in Hollywood … it was a hot August day in 1969. August 8, 1969, to be precise. Rick and Cliff come back from Italy, where Rick has recently shot four films (with Cliff doing stunts), and Kurt Russell's delivery of the title "Kill Me Quickly Ringo, Said the Gringo" is his greatest moment in the movie. Rick is now married to an Italian actress, and he can no longer afford to employ Cliff on a regular basis. He is planning to sell the Cielo Drive house and move somewhere less expensive. As this is the end of an era for the two of them, they decide to hang out that night and tie one on to say a proper goodbye. I feel like I haven’t said enough about Rick and Cliff’s relationship, but it is truly the backbone of the film (I was going to say the heart, but that is Sharon’s place). They’re basically family, and even though Cliff understands why their working relationship can’t continue, it’s still incredibly sad to know that these two are going their separate ways, professionally if not personally. Side note: if you had told 1990s me that there would be a movie that starred both my major celeb crushes of that time, Brad Pitt and Leonardo DiCaprio, I would have demanded you put me into a time machine and take me to see it that instant.

Next door, Sharon is eight months pregnant and her husband is in London working on a new project. She is visited during the day by her friend, British actress Joanna Pettet (played by Rumer Willis), and that evening she and Jay, and houseguests Wojciech Frykowski and Abigail Folger (the latter played by The Love Witch herself, Samantha Robinson), go to El Coyote for dinner (as they did in real life). In a probably apocryphal moment, Sharon glances down the street at a porn theater and comments, “I didn’t know porn movies *had* premieres.” That theater is the same one that would eventually become the New Beverly Cinema, the repertory theater Tarantino now owns and whose calendar he programs every month (he even did the calendar while shooting OUATIH). Rick and Cliff go to a different Mexican restaurant and, eventually, everyone returns to the two houses on Cielo Drive to settle in for the night. There's a sweet scene where Sharon, Jay and Wojciech stand around a piano as Abigail plays the Mamas and the Papas' song "Straight Shooter." In real life, sheet music of that song was sitting on the piano at the murder scene.

Cliff finds the LSD-dipped cigarette exactly where he left it six months before and decides that tonight is the night. He lights it up and goes to walk his dog, Brandy. Rick, in another part of the house, hears the loudest, clunkiest trash-heap of an automobile pull up outside. Muttering about how this is a private road and how much he pays in property taxes to keep riff-raff like this away from his home, he goes outside in his robe to give the intruders “what fer.” He manages to persuade them to leave, but they just park on another street and walk back. I should say that by “they” I mean Tex Watson, Susan Atkins, Patricia Krenwinkle and Linda Kasabian (the latter played by Uma and Ethan’s bb, Maya Hawke) of the Manson Family. Before they walk back up Cielo Drive, Tex reminds them of Charlie’s instructions -- kill everyone inside, and make it look witchy. But Patricia and Tex realize that the guy who yelled at them was Rick Dalton from "Bounty Law," and they're torn between being outraged and being fans. Susan then has an idea, which is so harebrained I can’t really remember it well enough to reproduce it here (we grew up watching TV, TV taught us to murder, let's kill the people who taught us murder, something like that?), but in any case, the plan has now changed.

Long story short (WAY too late, yes?), because Rick drew their attention, they go to his house instead of the house next door. Cliff, high as a kite from the LSD cigarette, fights them off (with help from Good Doggie Brandy) and brutally kills Tex and Patricia in (mostly) self-defense. Perhaps it seemed more violent because the rest of the movie was so light on violence, but this was almost too much for me. Patricia Krenwinkle, in particular, comes in for a hell of a beating that felt over-the-top and bordered on misogyny (my other major wrinkle with the film). I mean, Cliff is high and may not quite be aware of what is happening (he hilariously asks Tex “are you real?”), but damn. Susan Atkins, who for my money was in real life the scariest of Manson’s followers (and who in this version of events Cliff smashes in the face by throwing a can of dog food at her), crashes through the sliding glass door into the backyard, screaming like a banshee, and comes across Rick, who goes to his shed and returns to dispatch her with the most amazing use of Chekhov’s Gun (in this film, Chekhov's Flame Thrower) that I've ever seen.

The police come, carry off the bodies, put an injured Cliff in an ambulance and take some statements. As they leave, Jay Sebring comes to the gate of 10050 -- in this universe, an address that will never be known as the “Manson murder house” -- to ask if everyone is alright. And I start crying. Rick tells him what happened and Jay is flabbergasted. They chat for a bit and Jay says he’s been teasing Sharon about living next door to Jake Cahill from “Bounty Law” and Rick is clearly pleased that they know who he is. Sharon’s voice comes over the intercom at the gate (I cry even harder) and she asks if everyone is okay before inviting Rick in for a drink. So Rick goes up to the house and Sharon comes out to meet him and gives him a hug before introducing him to the other guests. We watch this play out from above and the credits roll over a world where Sharon Tate not only got to live past the age of 26 but was spared every bit of the violence that defined her life in our world. And maybe Rick got to be in Polanski’s next movie (which in this universe probably wasn’t MACBETH).

*****


I loved this movie so much. It’s a longer-than-average movie, but I never felt it and could have kept watching it for another couple of hours at least. It’s a wonderful love letter to the LA of Tarantino’s childhood, and it imagines a version of it where Manson didn’t become a cultural icon and those murders never took place. (Speculating here, I like to think the police raided Spahn Ranch pretty soon after the events at the end of the film, since Cliff recognized them from his trip out there.) I’m sure some people feel it’s tacky to rewrite events like that, but I love the idea that there is a universe, even if it’s a made-up one, where someone's existence in the world literally changes the course of another person's life, however unwittingly. And it feels like so much more than just a cheap fanfiction “what if” because Tarantino has spent so much time establishing this world and what it looks and sounds and feels like.

I broke it down here by characters, but it’s all woven together into one story (another somewhat departure for Tarantino, who has broken many of his films up into “chapters”). And part of the point in the way he constructs it is to juxtapose Sharon’s experience with Rick's (and Cliff’s, to a certain extent) and reinforce just how much someone’s fate in Hollywood can turn on good or bad luck.

The use of music in this is great (hardly uncharacteristic for a QT film), and as I said above, mostly plays *in* the scenes, not over them. Even the couple of pieces of music that are meant to create a sense of dread are playing in the scenes -- the score to the television show Squeaky is watching providing an ominous backdrop to Cliff searching George Spahn’s house, and Cliff’s playing a record of Vanilla Fudge’s cover of “Keep Me Hanging On” providing the perfect entrance music for “I’m the devil … and I’m here to do the devil’s business.”

I also have to give MASSIVE love to the production designer, Barbara Ling, who pulled off nothing less than a miracle with this movie. (Also Arianne Phillips -- Madonna’s stylist -- who did the 1960s costumes). The detail in the set design is like nothing I’ve ever seen before and the costumes are really extraordinary (Sharon’s costumes are near replicas of real outfits she was photographed in). The movie was shot in LA, but LA now doesn’t look a whole lot like it did in 1969 (barring a few notable landmarks), and this is Mad-Men-level detail. And even more impressive because so much of it happens outdoors, on location. Maybe my favorite moment (of many) is a little montage showing all the neon signs being turned on all over town as it gets dark on that fateful August night. If Barbara Ling is not at least NOMINATED for an Oscar, then why do we even give out awards?!

One thing that concerns me is that a lot of people who will see this will not be aware of the history of the Manson murders. I knew very little about them myself until listening to Karina Longworth's podcast series on the subject (which I highly recommend seeking out because it is excellent). The movie takes for granted that you know what happened and who these people are, but I’m not sure younger people do. My hope is that the movie inspires people to dig into the subject on their own. I know that my knowing more about it made the movie richer for me, and I was pleased that -- aside from the dramatically different ending -- the movie strays very little from the facts and includes or references several details that sort of morbidly delighted me to catch.

I don’t know where this falls in my personal ranking of QT films (not that I really have one). It’s too new and I need to see it many, many more times. And I can’t wait to do just that. Also, if you made it this far and haven’t seen it yet, stick around for the credits, which feature easily the most substantial Red Apple Cigarettes cameo in any of Tarantino’s movies (you’ll see a pack briefly in the scene with Cliff repairing the antenna, but the credits clip is the big reference).